Its annual allocation is $4 million hasn't been increased in the past four years, despite the fact that nearly 300 applicants have been denied loans because the program lacked funding -- a paltry $1.3 million, out of multi-billion-dollar budget.
Two weeks ago, South Carolina's House adopted a plan that represents a foot-in-the-door to dismantle public education through funding starvation.
So today, the state's Education Oversight Commission issued a report that requests additional funding to this tremendously valuable student-loan program.
Question: What are the chances that our anti-public education lawmakers and governor will approve an increase in appropriations to help worthy and qualified students attend and afford college to become education professionals?
That's a tough one, isn't it?
Reporter Seanna Adcox explains the history of the program and the EOC's report here:
A state education committee wants legislators to put more money into a teacher loan program meant to encourage students to stay in South Carolina and teach in needy public schools.
The Education Oversight Committee also recommends redefining such schools amid climbing poverty rates and believes students should be better informed about the program.
The loan program created in 1984 provides a maximum of $20,000 toward a student's college degree in education — up to $2,500 yearly for college freshmen and sophomores, and up to $5,000 for juniors, seniors and graduate students. The amount is forgiven within five years of teaching in a needy school or a hard-to-fill subject — sooner if both definitions apply. Students must pay the money back, with interest, if they don't do so after graduation.
Last school year, the state Student Loan Corp. doled out nearly $4.7 million in loans, averaging $4,182 each, to 1,114 education majors. The program used money from repaid loans to add to the Legislature's $4 million allotment, which hasn't changed since 2009-10, according to an annual report the oversight committee approved Monday.
More than 300 applicants were denied loans because of a lack of funding. An additional $1.3 million would have covered all eligible applicants.
The independent, nonpartisan committee made up of business leaders, educators and legislators chose to recommend in its 2013-14 budget recommendations to legislators that they increase funding to cover all of those eligible.
"We're turning down so many students we don't have funds for," said committee member Dennis Drew of Isle of Palms, a former teacher and founder of The Sunshine House early childhood centers.
Dennis Drew was one of former Governor Mark Sanford's several consecutive education advisors, so it's refreshing to hear him advocating for students who want to become educators.
The House's budget plan for 2012-13 put no additional money into the program. The Senate is working on its plan, which will be debated on that chamber's floor in May.
Nearly two-thirds of all public schools are deemed in critical need. Under state law, schools meet that definition if at least 70 percent of their students live in poverty, teacher turnover averages at least 20 percent, or their state report card scores are in the bottom two tiers. Of the 785 schools in critical need last school year, 669 qualified based solely on the poverty rate.
The committee recommends legislators increase the poverty threshold to 80 percent of students qualifying for free- or reduced-price meals. That helps focus the program on schools most in need, said Melanie Barton, the committee's executive director.
Rep. Joe Neal, a committee member, said he supports targeting schools most at risk, but he worries about the consequences.
"Schools failing most dramatically in the state are also those with high levels of poverty. Those schools tend not to do well, even though there are some exceptions," Neal, D-Hopkins, said after the meeting. "My only concern is what will that do to the marginal schools? Do we deprive them of that resource?"
The overall number of applicants has plummeted 56 percent in the three school years since 2008. Officials speculate that fewer students could be choosing a career in education following the Great Recession and resulting budget cuts, which led to thousands of teacher layoffs across the state.
A third recommendation from the committee is to put a state agency in charge of the program, which can set goals, communicate with colleges and market the program to students. Many students simply don't know the option exists, Barton said.
That could improve the program's diversity, she said.
Last school year, 77 percent of applicants were women and 80 percent were white. The number of loan recipients attending South Carolina's historically black colleges continues to decline, to just nine at South Carolina State, down from 42 students at that school and three others in 2007-08.
A diverse teaching force plays a role in motivating some students, Neal said.
"They need to see teachers who look like them," he said. "Clearly if we're going to have a teaching force that reflects South Carolina, we need a loan program that enables people from different groups in this state, particularly minorities, to actually do so."
The default rate on the program — those who didn't teach and didn't pay back the money — has been 1 percent. Last school year, more than 6,500 teachers employed in South Carolina's public schools were loan recipients, according to the report.
If the EOC continues to issue reports and requests of this sort, noble and necessary as they are, the commission may find itself written out of the budget altogether. It has happened before -- though its funding was always restored at the last minute, thanks to pro-public education members of the state Senate.
Come to think of it, the Senate is due to take up its own budget debate in the coming weeks, so maybe we'll hear more about this loan program before the session ends in June.